Receiving voltage
—
pu
Voltage regulation
—
%
FACTS Q support
—
pu
Load-bus angle
—
degrees
Line current
—
pu
System state
—
—
Interactive Transmission Network
Publication-Style Phasor Diagram
Live Voltage & Reactive-Power Indicators
Voltage Profile vs Reactive Loading
Uncompensated SVC STATCOM Vref
Reactive-Power Support
Load Q FACTS Q Net
Q
Live Mathematical Model & Calculations
1. Transmission-line power transfer
2. Receiving-end voltage approximation
3. Net reactive power
4. SVC model
5. STATCOM model
6. Voltage regulation
| Calculated quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Vs | — |
| Vr | — |
| X | — |
| PL | — |
| QL | — |
| QFACTS | — |
| Qnet | — |
| |I| | — |
| δ | — |
| Voltage regulation | — |
SVC vs STATCOM — Engineering Comparison
| Parameter | SVC | STATCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Converter type | Thyristor controlled | Voltage-source converter |
| Reactive element | Variable susceptance | Converter voltage source |
| Shunt connection | Yes | Yes |
| Voltage control | Fast | Very fast |
| Low-voltage reactive current | Decreases with voltage | Can remain strongly controllable |
| Typical application | Voltage support / power factor | Dynamic voltage stabilization |
Virtual Laboratory Observation
The receiving-end voltage is strongly influenced by transmission reactance and reactive loading. Increasing QL or X increases the voltage drop across the transmission corridor.
An SVC changes its effective shunt susceptance to inject or absorb reactive power. Its reactive-power output is approximately proportional to Vr2.
A STATCOM regulates reactive current through a controllable converter voltage. The simulation therefore illustrates why STATCOM-based compensation can provide strong voltage support during depressed-voltage conditions.